
In this image released to the media, representatives of the three Naga national political groups NSCN/GPRN, FGN and GPRN/NSCN are seen here with the Naga flag at a meeting of the Joint Working Group of the Naga Reconciliation process which was organized by the Forum for Naga Reconciliation at Chiang Mai, Thailand on September 23. From left: Alezo Venuh, VS Atem, Zhopra Vero, Azheto Chopy, Somba Chang, Lukto Swu, Ngukshi Lam, Pesouh and Wangtin Naga. (File Photo: Courtesy/FNR)
As the ‘Journey of common hope’ enters the fourth year and the fourth month of the new calendar, the imperative of the proposed “highest level meeting” of the Naga political groups has taken centre-stage. Concerns have been raised that if the parties involved do not ‘take the plunge,’ then the elusive “meeting” might as well turn out to be the search for Eldorado or the Philosopher’s stone. The Quakers, a group of international pacifists, have advised the Naga groups against delaying the “highest-level meeting.”
“We believe that it is now the earnest will of the Naga people for high-level talks to be held at this point. The longer such a meeting is put off, the more difficult it will be for the reconciliation process to be carried forward. It may not be possible to remove all obstacles before such a meeting,” the Quakers stated in an open letter to Naga leaders Th. Muivah, Kitovi Zhimomi and S Singnya on March 12, 2011.
“It is your commitment to reconciliation before God and the Naga people that must carry the day. We appeal to you to seize this opportunity to meet and to sign an agreement, go beyond your difficulties and strengthen the reconciliation process,” the letter said. Similarly, the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR) spearheading the “Naga Reconciliation: A journey of common hope” in an open letter last month (March 18, 2011) to the three groups –NNC/FGN, GPRN/NSCN and NSCN/GPRN- said the “time to decide and act is now.”
“It is time for all Nagas to question our own personal commitment to reconciliation. The longer you delay the highest level reconciliation meeting, the greater the chances of the Naga reconciliation process becoming vulnerable to violence by internal and external forces. The time to decide and act is now,” FNR said. FNR said the open letter was written on behalf of a “beleaguered people” who, despite their anguish, continue their journey of common hope.
“In times of difficulties such as the present, you may be tempted to take any one of these four approaches in dealing with the situation: (1) Flee it! (2) Fight it! (3) Forget it! (4) Face it! The first three will end in failure—only the fourth option will open the door to strengthen reconciliation,” FNR said.
Decades of bitter internecine conflicts and contest for territorial domination among the Naga groups, have made the healing and reconciliation process a tough call. Nonetheless, the efforts of the past three years have not gone in vain as the FNR at a press conference on March 30 (2011) said, “We have experienced within the last three years that ‘impossibilities’ can be turned to ‘possibilities.’
The spirit of concreted hope and faith needs to be renewed and carried on.” The Forum also said that “While FNR pursues the desires and longings of the people, we earnestly entreat one and all to bear in mind that reconciliation process has started a new chapter of unraveling issues of logistics, security, communication and trust building – the core bases on the practical level towards the goal.”
And after a lull, the journey seems to be back on track with the Naga political groups re-affirming their commitment to the ‘Covenant of Reconciliation.’ Hopes of the proposed “highest level meeting” have also revived with the three groups giving verbal or written assurances to FNR that they have not backtracked from their commitments.
The NNC/FGN in a letter to FNR and Naga public signed by Kedaghe (president) ‘Brig’ (retd) S Singnya and vice president Zhopra Vero, dated March 28, stated, “While we remain steadfast to the COR, we are sincerely committed to the Highest Level Naga Summit to be held at the earliest.”
In the meantime, the FGN implored the Naga people to be patient as the signatories of the COR prepare all “logistical needs” for the summit. The GPRN/NSCN also in a letter to FNR dated March 28, admitted that though at times Nagas have been “swayed by forces despite our assurance,” the GPRN/NSCN remains committed to upholding the spirit of COR by working out differences in the “spirit of love, non-violence, peace and respect to resolve our outstanding issues amongst us.” “Due to circumstances beyond our control, the meeting of the highest level leadership has been delayed. However, we pledge our commitment to the FNR in their positive efforts for the reconciliation of Nagas,” stated the GPRN/NSCN letter signed by general secretary Kitovi Zhimomi and C-in-C, Naga Army, Gen. Khole.
FNR convenor Rev. Wati Aier also briefed the media about his meeting with NSCN/GPRN chairman Isak Chishi Swu and general secretary Th. Muivah and their comments on reconciliation and proposed highest level meeting, at Hebron Camp on Tuesday last.
According to Rev. Wati, the NSCN chairman reiterated his earlier dictum saying, “I pray daily for FNR and Naga reconciliation. All Nagas must come together. I and my government shall fully abide by the COR.” Likewise, the FNR convenor quoted Muivah’s comment: “We must make it clear that we are for reconciliation. Let us not make any pretext nor rationalize at the expense of the Naga national cause…Chairman (Isak Swu) and I are fully committed to Naga reconciliation and we will never divert from COR.”
It may be mentioned the GPRN/NSCN had earlier decided to keep in abeyance its participation in the highest level meeting accusing the rival NSCN/GPRN of breaching the ‘Covenant of Reconciliation.”
Both GPRN/NSCN chairman SS Khaplang and general secretary Kitovi Zhimomi in their Naga ‘Republic Day’ speeches on March 21 last, have stated that the group was compelled to disengage itself from the ‘meeting’ because of the reported ongoing “offensive” and “territorial expansion” of the rival group in Eastern Nagaland (Myanmar).
The NSCN/GPRN has, on its part, denied the accusations. Amid the tension, the FGN proved to be a balm as the group sought pardon from the Naga people for “all the mistakes” committed by the group. FGN vice president Zhopra in a statement dated March 16 (2011) expressed concern over the “recent outbreak of violence in Eastern Nagaland and in the Pochury region,” and said that such incidents lead to mistrust and suspicion. While pleading that the highest level meet be convened “without delay,” the FGN also requested all Naga national groups and patriots to take up the “cross of reconciliation in the spirit of forgiveness.”
Earlier, on November 18, 2010, concerned over the delay, representatives from 40 Naga organizations and tribal bodies at a meeting called by the FNR in Dimapur unanimously proposed that the “highest level meeting” should be convened within the next 45 days.
The FNR also since October 2010 had a total of 31 meetings with the political groups and their leaders, either jointly or separately, to push the ‘meeting.’ The Naga people, who have extended solidarity, support and cooperation throughout the journey and who are still anxiously awaiting the ‘meeting’ have one question in their mind – “How long?” “After all the expectations, if the highest level meeting does not come to pass, then it will be another missed opportunity in the pages of Naga history,” a Naga elder said.
“We believe that it is now the earnest will of the Naga people for high-level talks to be held at this point. The longer such a meeting is put off, the more difficult it will be for the reconciliation process to be carried forward. It may not be possible to remove all obstacles before such a meeting,” the Quakers stated in an open letter to Naga leaders Th. Muivah, Kitovi Zhimomi and S Singnya on March 12, 2011.
“It is your commitment to reconciliation before God and the Naga people that must carry the day. We appeal to you to seize this opportunity to meet and to sign an agreement, go beyond your difficulties and strengthen the reconciliation process,” the letter said. Similarly, the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR) spearheading the “Naga Reconciliation: A journey of common hope” in an open letter last month (March 18, 2011) to the three groups –NNC/FGN, GPRN/NSCN and NSCN/GPRN- said the “time to decide and act is now.”
“It is time for all Nagas to question our own personal commitment to reconciliation. The longer you delay the highest level reconciliation meeting, the greater the chances of the Naga reconciliation process becoming vulnerable to violence by internal and external forces. The time to decide and act is now,” FNR said. FNR said the open letter was written on behalf of a “beleaguered people” who, despite their anguish, continue their journey of common hope.
“In times of difficulties such as the present, you may be tempted to take any one of these four approaches in dealing with the situation: (1) Flee it! (2) Fight it! (3) Forget it! (4) Face it! The first three will end in failure—only the fourth option will open the door to strengthen reconciliation,” FNR said.
Decades of bitter internecine conflicts and contest for territorial domination among the Naga groups, have made the healing and reconciliation process a tough call. Nonetheless, the efforts of the past three years have not gone in vain as the FNR at a press conference on March 30 (2011) said, “We have experienced within the last three years that ‘impossibilities’ can be turned to ‘possibilities.’
The spirit of concreted hope and faith needs to be renewed and carried on.” The Forum also said that “While FNR pursues the desires and longings of the people, we earnestly entreat one and all to bear in mind that reconciliation process has started a new chapter of unraveling issues of logistics, security, communication and trust building – the core bases on the practical level towards the goal.”
And after a lull, the journey seems to be back on track with the Naga political groups re-affirming their commitment to the ‘Covenant of Reconciliation.’ Hopes of the proposed “highest level meeting” have also revived with the three groups giving verbal or written assurances to FNR that they have not backtracked from their commitments.
The NNC/FGN in a letter to FNR and Naga public signed by Kedaghe (president) ‘Brig’ (retd) S Singnya and vice president Zhopra Vero, dated March 28, stated, “While we remain steadfast to the COR, we are sincerely committed to the Highest Level Naga Summit to be held at the earliest.”
In the meantime, the FGN implored the Naga people to be patient as the signatories of the COR prepare all “logistical needs” for the summit. The GPRN/NSCN also in a letter to FNR dated March 28, admitted that though at times Nagas have been “swayed by forces despite our assurance,” the GPRN/NSCN remains committed to upholding the spirit of COR by working out differences in the “spirit of love, non-violence, peace and respect to resolve our outstanding issues amongst us.” “Due to circumstances beyond our control, the meeting of the highest level leadership has been delayed. However, we pledge our commitment to the FNR in their positive efforts for the reconciliation of Nagas,” stated the GPRN/NSCN letter signed by general secretary Kitovi Zhimomi and C-in-C, Naga Army, Gen. Khole.
FNR convenor Rev. Wati Aier also briefed the media about his meeting with NSCN/GPRN chairman Isak Chishi Swu and general secretary Th. Muivah and their comments on reconciliation and proposed highest level meeting, at Hebron Camp on Tuesday last.
According to Rev. Wati, the NSCN chairman reiterated his earlier dictum saying, “I pray daily for FNR and Naga reconciliation. All Nagas must come together. I and my government shall fully abide by the COR.” Likewise, the FNR convenor quoted Muivah’s comment: “We must make it clear that we are for reconciliation. Let us not make any pretext nor rationalize at the expense of the Naga national cause…Chairman (Isak Swu) and I are fully committed to Naga reconciliation and we will never divert from COR.”
It may be mentioned the GPRN/NSCN had earlier decided to keep in abeyance its participation in the highest level meeting accusing the rival NSCN/GPRN of breaching the ‘Covenant of Reconciliation.”
Both GPRN/NSCN chairman SS Khaplang and general secretary Kitovi Zhimomi in their Naga ‘Republic Day’ speeches on March 21 last, have stated that the group was compelled to disengage itself from the ‘meeting’ because of the reported ongoing “offensive” and “territorial expansion” of the rival group in Eastern Nagaland (Myanmar).
The NSCN/GPRN has, on its part, denied the accusations. Amid the tension, the FGN proved to be a balm as the group sought pardon from the Naga people for “all the mistakes” committed by the group. FGN vice president Zhopra in a statement dated March 16 (2011) expressed concern over the “recent outbreak of violence in Eastern Nagaland and in the Pochury region,” and said that such incidents lead to mistrust and suspicion. While pleading that the highest level meet be convened “without delay,” the FGN also requested all Naga national groups and patriots to take up the “cross of reconciliation in the spirit of forgiveness.”
Earlier, on November 18, 2010, concerned over the delay, representatives from 40 Naga organizations and tribal bodies at a meeting called by the FNR in Dimapur unanimously proposed that the “highest level meeting” should be convened within the next 45 days.
The FNR also since October 2010 had a total of 31 meetings with the political groups and their leaders, either jointly or separately, to push the ‘meeting.’ The Naga people, who have extended solidarity, support and cooperation throughout the journey and who are still anxiously awaiting the ‘meeting’ have one question in their mind – “How long?” “After all the expectations, if the highest level meeting does not come to pass, then it will be another missed opportunity in the pages of Naga history,” a Naga elder said.
(The report is part of media fellowship for the 2010-2011 cycle of Panos South Asia's plural media and peace building in Northeast India)